This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
yet I'm not scum but you continue to push there. + its only you and listo that continue to scum read me so I'm not really consensus. Why is it ok for you to not want to bleed but you expect me to be bleed/lynched?
Do we know in fact if there was a convert? If the was and scum is future/satsu then you or BN is the convert
Shouldn't we be beyond gut at this point?
we could just kill the MM today and I can be confirmed town since you seem unwilling to move on, listo
scum need you to be useful today.
See the thing is that if you were interested in "giving me any inclination that you are town and can be trusted" you are going to have to use your words and have a conversation but shutting down and going "nope!" is either really scummy or super unhelpful. but sure, let's talk about our interactions!
I asked you yesterday to give me examples of me getting mad at people for not agreeing with me and even if that was true (wich its not) why would scum do that?
I don't fully trust Mazer b/c he did lightly defend/stall a 3pup lynch. The last sentence in the first quote and the last quote makes me think his plan is to just follow Listo around.
Can you quote some examples b/c I don't think this is true? Maybe you are trying to claim that me questioning people's logic for scum reading a slot that I know can't be scum is "being combative", if so that's really not the same thing as "being combative when people don't agree with you." but I don't think I've ever lashed out at disagreeing with me.
other than me calling you scum and voting you yesterday, any reason why?
like you either have bad info or you were just being manipulative to get a jack lynch. I trust nothng you say.
there's not really a right or a wrong way to play mafia. There's nothing wrong with sitting back and letting night actions do the work although I think that's mostly unreliable. I'm sure that in the history of mafia, there have been games solved by na's alone. Day play also impacts night action choice unless every action is purely random. If someone were to make a venn diagram there'd be an overlap between good town pr play and good scum play.
I'm a little confused. You said I was going for easy inactives. I asked you why you didn't call me out and you said it was because you were not here. Maybe not at the beginning of d2 but you were very much around d1 when I was pushing Morrison. So why not call me out then? What's the difference between me going after you, satsu, and Morrison and Nightengale going after Morrison and CWE? I don't at all understand the last series of questions. I found all 3 of you scummy and I said as much
I didn't much like listo muchd1 as all he did was mechanics talk. I think listo could be cult/unseen here but if he's to be believed then he has info that points to Jack being scum.
not really sure why this bothered anyone. There are less than 24 hours and we can't even get a wagon on the pseudo guilty. There could certainly be an uptick in activity and we put together a lynch by the end of the day but I still feel like there hasn't been that much accomplished today, idk. So far my semi prediction seems to be coming true.
Why not call me out yesterday? Why are you and BN focusing on me going after inactive but not nightengale? Are you guys just scum that thinks I'll be an easier lynch than her? What is your read on Morrison?
maybe but his vote is still really dumb
I assume the people voting him. It's such a throw away vote to vote someone that's gonna die